← My Auto Racer All cars Alfa Romeo 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165

The Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 reaches 60 mph in 7.70 s (100 km/h in 8.34 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.13 s, tripping the lights at 89.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.83 s and the eighth mile in 10.59 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 Pontiac Grand Prix 3.8 V6 203

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165
0–60 mph7.70 s
0–100 km/h8.34 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.83 s
1/8 mile10.59 s
1/4 mile16.13 s
Trap speed89.0 mph

About the GT 2.0 JTS 165

The 2003 Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 is a front-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,320 kg with 162 bhp, which works out at 123 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.83 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 5,919th quickest to 60 mph, and the 79th quickest of the 268 Alfa Romeos here. Its 89.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165
Year2003
Power162 hp (121 kW)
Kerb mass1,320 kg
Power to weight123 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed134 mph (216 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Pontiac Grand Prix 3.8 V6 20320037.70 s16.24 s86.7 mph200 bhp
Toyota Camry 2.5 16019877.70 s16.21 s87.7 mph158 bhp
Lexus IS 250 V6 (US) 20420147.76 s16.09 s86.4 mph201 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Alfa Romeo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 0-60 time?
The Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 reaches 60 mph in 7.70 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 5,919th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 quarter mile time?
16.13 s at 89.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.59 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.83 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 have?
162 bhp and 1,320 kg, which is 123 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 216 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165?
Closest here on pace: Pontiac Grand Prix 3.8 V6 203 (7.70 s), Toyota Camry 2.5 160 (7.70 s), Lexus IS 250 V6 (US) 204 (7.76 s). Each one can be raced against the Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS 165 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.