← My Auto Racer All cars Cadillac 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175

The Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 reaches 60 mph in 8.83 s (100 km/h in 9.60 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.87 s, tripping the lights at 83.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.80 s and the eighth mile in 10.93 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 Mazda 6 Kombi 2.0 DISI

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175
0–60 mph8.83 s
0–100 km/h9.60 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.80 s
1/8 mile10.93 s
1/4 mile16.87 s
Trap speed83.2 mph

About the BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175

The 2007 Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 is a front-drive turbocharged estate of 1,540 kg with 173 bhp, which works out at 112 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.80 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,082nd quickest to 60 mph, and the 62nd quickest of the 65 Cadillacs here. Its 83.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175
Year2007
Power173 hp (129 kW)
Kerb mass1,540 kg
Power to weight112 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed131 mph (211 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Mazda 6 Kombi 2.0 DISI20098.80 s16.87 s84.6 mph153 bhp
Toyota Avensis Wagon 2.0 VVT-i 14720038.80 s16.89 s88.0 mph145 bhp
Volvo V70 D5 wagon20158.77 s16.81 s84.6 mph182 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Cadillac 0-60 timesevery modelFastest estate cars1,484 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 0-60 time?
The Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 reaches 60 mph in 8.83 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,082nd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 quarter mile time?
16.87 s at 83.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.93 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.80 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 have?
173 bhp and 1,540 kg, which is 112 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 211 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175?
Closest here on pace: Mazda 6 Kombi 2.0 DISI (8.80 s), Toyota Avensis Wagon 2.0 VVT-i 147 (8.80 s), Volvo V70 D5 wagon (8.77 s). Each one can be raced against the Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 Turbo 175 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.