← My Auto Racer All cars Fiat 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988)

The Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) reaches 60 mph in 9.20 s (100 km/h in 9.72 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.03 s, tripping the lights at 82.7 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.86 s and the eighth mile in 11.07 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) Mitsubishi Galant Hatchback 1.8i 126

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988)
0–60 mph9.20 s
0–100 km/h9.72 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.86 s
1/8 mile11.07 s
1/4 mile17.03 s
Trap speed82.7 mph

About the Tipo 5dr 2.0 113

The 1988 Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,116 kg with 111 bhp, which works out at 100 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.86 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,785th quickest to 60 mph, and the 96th quickest of the 455 Fiats here. Its 82.7 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988)
Year1988
Power111 hp (83 kW)
Kerb mass1,116 kg
Power to weight100 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed118 mph (190 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Mitsubishi Galant Hatchback 1.8i 12619939.21 s16.99 s83.5 mph125 bhp
Kia Picanto 5dr 1.0 T-GDI 10020179.14 s16.98 s80.8 mph99 bhp
Citroen Xantia 2.0i 12219939.21 s17.00 s83.3 mph121 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Fiat 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,681 carsFastest cars of the 1980s1,057 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) 0-60 time?
The Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) reaches 60 mph in 9.20 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,785th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) quarter mile time?
17.03 s at 82.7 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.07 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.86 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) have?
111 bhp and 1,116 kg, which is 100 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 190 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988)?
Closest here on pace: Mitsubishi Galant Hatchback 1.8i 126 (9.21 s), Kia Picanto 5dr 1.0 T-GDI 100 (9.14 s), Citroen Xantia 2.0i 122 (9.21 s). Each one can be raced against the Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Fiat Tipo 5dr 2.0 113 (1988) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.