← My Auto Racer All cars Honda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83

The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 reaches 60 mph in 11.13 s (100 km/h in 11.98 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.24 s, tripping the lights at 74.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.85 s and the eighth mile in 11.65 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 Nissan Almera / Pulsar 3dr 2.2 Di 110

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83
0–60 mph11.13 s
0–100 km/h11.98 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.85 s
1/8 mile11.65 s
1/4 mile18.24 s
Trap speed74.3 mph

About the Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83

The 2002 Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 980 kg with 82 bhp, which works out at 83 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.85 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 11,827th quickest to 60 mph, and the 150th quickest of the 191 Hondas here. It leaves better than it pulls: 74.3 mph at the lights is only the 12,944th highest here, so its 0-60 flatters what it does further out. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83
Year2002
Power82 hp (61 kW)
Kerb mass980 kg
Power to weight83 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears1
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed99 mph (159 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Nissan Almera / Pulsar 3dr 2.2 Di 110200011.15 s18.18 s75.8 mph109 bhp
Audi A3 Sportback 1.6 102 (2004)200411.13 s18.32 s77.6 mph101 bhp
Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 1.6 107200411.09 s18.36 s76.1 mph106 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,681 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 0-60 time?
The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 reaches 60 mph in 11.13 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 11,827th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 quarter mile time?
18.24 s at 74.3 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.65 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.85 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 have?
82 bhp and 980 kg, which is 83 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 1 gears and a quoted top speed of 159 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83?
Closest here on pace: Nissan Almera / Pulsar 3dr 2.2 Di 110 (11.15 s), Audi A3 Sportback 1.6 102 (2004) (11.13 s), Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 1.6 107 (11.09 s). Each one can be raced against the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.4i CVT 83 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.