← My Auto Racer All cars Jeep 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007)

The Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) reaches 60 mph in 9.66 s (100 km/h in 10.21 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.36 s, tripping the lights at 81.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.92 s and the eighth mile in 11.28 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) Toyota RAV4 5dr 2.0 VVT-i 152

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007)
0–60 mph9.66 s
0–100 km/h10.21 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.92 s
1/8 mile11.28 s
1/4 mile17.36 s
Trap speed81.0 mph

About the Compass 2.0 156

The 2007 Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) is a front-drive naturally aspirated SUV of 1,499 kg with 154 bhp, which works out at 103 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.92 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,564th quickest to 60 mph, and the 44th quickest of the 68 Jeeps here. Its 81.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007)
Year2007
Power154 hp (115 kW)
Kerb mass1,499 kg
Power to weight103 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed115 mph (185 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Toyota RAV4 5dr 2.0 VVT-i 15220069.66 s17.36 s81.0 mph150 bhp
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 2WD 15020129.66 s17.34 s81.4 mph148 bhp
Kia Sportage 2.0 GSL 16320109.64 s17.29 s79.4 mph161 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Jeep 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) 0-60 time?
The Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) reaches 60 mph in 9.66 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,564th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) quarter mile time?
17.36 s at 81.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.28 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.92 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) have?
154 bhp and 1,499 kg, which is 103 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 185 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007)?
Closest here on pace: Toyota RAV4 5dr 2.0 VVT-i 152 (9.66 s), Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 2WD 150 (9.66 s), Kia Sportage 2.0 GSL 163 (9.64 s). Each one can be raced against the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2007) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.