← My Auto Racer All cars Mazda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129

The Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s (100 km/h in 10.49 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.22 s, tripping the lights at 79.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.58 s and the eighth mile in 11.06 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 JTD 136

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129
0–60 mph9.92 s
0–100 km/h10.49 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.58 s
1/8 mile11.06 s
1/4 mile17.22 s
Trap speed79.3 mph

About the 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129

The 2007 Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 is a front-drive turbodiesel estate of 1,430 kg with 129 bhp, which works out at 90 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.58 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,976th quickest to 60 mph, and the 123rd quickest of the 201 Mazdas here. Its 79.3 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129
Year2007
Power129 hp (96 kW)
Kerb mass1,430 kg
Power to weight90 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbodiesel
Top speed121 mph (195 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 JTD 13619969.81 s17.28 s79.8 mph134 bhp
Citroen CX Break 2.3 12819829.84 s17.48 s80.6 mph123 bhp
Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.2 16320129.77 s17.32 s79.0 mph161 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest estate cars1,484 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 0-60 time?
The Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,976th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 quarter mile time?
17.22 s at 79.3 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.06 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.58 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 have?
129 bhp and 1,430 kg, which is 90 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbodiesel, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 195 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129?
Closest here on pace: Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 JTD 136 (9.81 s), Citroen CX Break 2.3 128 (9.84 s), Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.2 163 (9.77 s). Each one can be raced against the Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mazda 6/Atenza Wagon 2.2 D 129 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.