← My Auto Racer All cars Mitsubishi 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96

The Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 reaches 60 mph in 11.49 s (100 km/h in 12.17 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.55 s, tripping the lights at 76.4 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.19 s and the eighth mile in 12.11 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 Lancia Dedra Station Wagon 1.8 5TM 101

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96
0–60 mph11.49 s
0–100 km/h12.17 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.19 s
1/8 mile12.11 s
1/4 mile18.55 s
Trap speed76.4 mph

About the Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96

The 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 is a front-drive naturally aspirated estate of 1,275 kg with 97 bhp, which works out at 76 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.19 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 12,269th quickest to 60 mph, and the 121st quickest of the 164 Mitsubishis here. Its 76.4 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96
Year2003
Power97 hp (72 kW)
Kerb mass1,275 kg
Power to weight76 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed112 mph (180 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Lancia Dedra Station Wagon 1.8 5TM 101199411.59 s18.61 s76.2 mph99 bhp
Chevrolet Cruze Wagon 1.6 124201211.51 s18.54 s77.3 mph122 bhp
Ford Focus Estate 1.5 EcoBlue 120201811.52 s18.24 s74.5 mph118 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mitsubishi 0-60 timesevery modelFastest estate cars1,484 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 reaches 60 mph in 11.49 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 12,269th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 quarter mile time?
18.55 s at 76.4 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 12.11 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.19 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 have?
97 bhp and 1,275 kg, which is 76 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 180 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96?
Closest here on pace: Lancia Dedra Station Wagon 1.8 5TM 101 (11.59 s), Chevrolet Cruze Wagon 1.6 124 (11.51 s), Ford Focus Estate 1.5 EcoBlue 120 (11.52 s). Each one can be raced against the Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mitsubishi Lancer Combi 1.6 16V 96 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.