← My Auto Racer All cars Mitsubishi 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112

The Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 reaches 60 mph in 9.66 s (100 km/h in 10.21 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.36 s, tripping the lights at 81.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.93 s and the eighth mile in 11.29 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 DS Automobiles DS3 1.4 VTi 90

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112
0–60 mph9.66 s
0–100 km/h10.21 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.93 s
1/8 mile11.29 s
1/4 mile17.36 s
Trap speed81.2 mph

About the Space Star 1.8 16V 112

The 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,180 kg with 110 bhp, which works out at 93 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.93 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,575th quickest to 60 mph, and the 80th quickest of the 164 Mitsubishis here. Its 81.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112
Year2002
Power110 hp (82 kW)
Kerb mass1,180 kg
Power to weight93 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed116 mph (187 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
DS Automobiles DS3 1.4 VTi 9020149.65 s17.37 s80.8 mph101 bhp
Fiat 500 C 1.3 Multijet 9520099.68 s17.32 s79.2 mph94 bhp
SEAT Exeo ST 2.0 TDI20099.64 s17.44 s81.5 mph141 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mitsubishi 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,681 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 reaches 60 mph in 9.66 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,575th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 quarter mile time?
17.36 s at 81.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.29 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.93 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 have?
110 bhp and 1,180 kg, which is 93 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 187 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112?
Closest here on pace: DS Automobiles DS3 1.4 VTi 90 (9.65 s), Fiat 500 C 1.3 Multijet 95 (9.68 s), SEAT Exeo ST 2.0 TDI (9.64 s). Each one can be raced against the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mitsubishi Space Star 1.8 16V 112 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.