← My Auto Racer All cars Peugeot 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75

The Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 reaches 60 mph in 13.13 s (100 km/h in 14.05 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 19.19 s, tripping the lights at 72.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.12 s and the eighth mile in 12.33 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 Suzuki Wagon R 1.3 DDiS 70

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75
0–60 mph13.13 s
0–100 km/h14.05 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.12 s
1/8 mile12.33 s
1/4 mile19.19 s
Trap speed72.0 mph

About the Partner Combi 1.4 75

The 2002 Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 is a front-drive naturally aspirated estate of 1,163 kg with 74 bhp, which works out at 63 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.12 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 13,665th quickest to 60 mph, and the 369th quickest of the 456 Peugeots here. Its 72.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75
Year2002
Power74 hp (55 kW)
Kerb mass1,163 kg
Power to weight63 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed93 mph (150 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Suzuki Wagon R 1.3 DDiS 70200312.98 s19.17 s70.9 mph68 bhp
Renault Megane Estate 1.4 75199913.02 s19.47 s72.6 mph74 bhp
Renault Kangoo 1.3 TCE 100202013.11 s19.14 s71.0 mph99 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Citroen Berlingo BlueHDi 130 (Mk3) vs Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Peugeot 0-60 timesevery modelFastest estate cars1,484 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 0-60 time?
The Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 reaches 60 mph in 13.13 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 13,665th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 quarter mile time?
19.19 s at 72.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 12.33 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.12 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 have?
74 bhp and 1,163 kg, which is 63 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 150 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75?
Closest here on pace: Suzuki Wagon R 1.3 DDiS 70 (12.98 s), Renault Megane Estate 1.4 75 (13.02 s), Renault Kangoo 1.3 TCE 100 (13.11 s). Each one can be raced against the Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Peugeot Partner Combi 1.4 75 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.