← My Auto Racer All cars Renault 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Renault Laguna 2.0 115

The Renault Laguna 2.0 115 reaches 60 mph in 9.67 s (100 km/h in 10.22 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.31 s, tripping the lights at 82.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.98 s and the eighth mile in 11.33 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Renault Laguna 2.0 115 VW Jetta 2.0 115

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Renault Laguna 2.0 115
0–60 mph9.67 s
0–100 km/h10.22 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.98 s
1/8 mile11.33 s
1/4 mile17.31 s
Trap speed82.2 mph

About the Laguna 2.0 115

The 1998 Renault Laguna 2.0 115 is a front-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,275 kg with 114 bhp, which works out at 89 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.98 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,594th quickest to 60 mph, and the 176th quickest of the 499 Renaults here. Its 82.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Renault Laguna 2.0 115
Year1998
Power114 hp (85 kW)
Kerb mass1,275 kg
Power to weight89 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed124 mph (200 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
VW Jetta 2.0 11520109.67 s17.33 s81.8 mph114 bhp
Mitsubishi Galant 2.0i 10919889.66 s17.36 s81.2 mph107 bhp
Citroen CX 2.4 12819829.66 s17.34 s81.6 mph123 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Renault Megane Estate 1.4 75 vs Renault Laguna 2.0 115Full comparison

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Renault 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Renault Laguna 2.0 115 0-60 time?
The Renault Laguna 2.0 115 reaches 60 mph in 9.67 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,594th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Renault Laguna 2.0 115 quarter mile time?
17.31 s at 82.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.33 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.98 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Renault Laguna 2.0 115 have?
114 bhp and 1,275 kg, which is 89 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 200 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Renault Laguna 2.0 115?
Closest here on pace: VW Jetta 2.0 115 (9.67 s), Mitsubishi Galant 2.0i 109 (9.66 s), Citroen CX 2.4 128 (9.66 s). Each one can be raced against the Renault Laguna 2.0 115 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Renault Laguna 2.0 115 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.