← My Auto Racer All cars Rolls-Royce 0-60 Comparisons Answers
The Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow reaches 60 mph in 11.06 s and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.26 s, tripping the lights at 77.8 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.16 s and the eighth mile in 11.95 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.
| Standing start | Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow |
|---|---|
| 0–60 mph | 11.06 s |
| 0–100 mph | — |
| 60 ft | 3.16 s |
| 1/8 mile | 11.95 s |
| 1/4 mile | 18.26 s |
| Trap speed | 77.8 mph |
The 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is a rear-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 2,061 kg with 197 bhp, which works out at 96 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 96 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 3.16 s. Against the 2,939 cars in the set it is the 2,916th quickest to 60 mph, and the 8th quickest of the 8 Rolls-Royces here. Its 77.8 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 9 of 9 published acceleration figures for this car.
| Specification | Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow |
|---|---|
| Year | 1968 |
| Power | 197 bhp |
| Kerb mass | 2,061 kg |
| Power to weight | 96 bhp/t |
| Drivetrain | Rear drive |
| Gears | 5 |
| Engine | Naturally aspirated |
| Top speed | 190 km/h |
| Car | Year | 0–60 | 1/4 mile | Trap | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet | 2017 | 10.85 s | 18.16 s | 77.7 mph | 89 bhp |
| Porsche 924 US/Japanese spec | 1977 | 10.81 s | 18.09 s | 78.8 mph | 110 bhp |
| Alfa Romeo Spider 1600 Duetto | 1966 | 10.81 s | 18.11 s | 77.7 mph | 107 bhp |
Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.
Figures regenerated 2026-09-02. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.