Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I vs Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I is the quicker car,
covering it in 16.87 s at
82.5 mph against the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98’s
19.29 s — a margin of
2.43 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I takes
8.76 s and the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98
12.75 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk IFord Corsair 2000E 2.0 98
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I
Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98
0–60 mph
8.76 s
12.75 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.67 s
3.38 s
1/8 mile
10.92 s
12.63 s
1/4 mile
16.87 s
19.29 s
Trap speed
82.5 mph
74.3 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
9/9 for the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I,
2/2 for the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I or the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.87 s to the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98's 19.29 s, a margin of 2.43 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s against 12.75 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.87 s at 82.5 mph.
What is the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98 0-60 time?
The Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98 reaches 60 mph in 12.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.29 s at 74.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I trips the lights at 82.5 mph and the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98 at 74.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 9 for the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I and 2 of 2 for the Ford Corsair 2000E 2.0 98. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.