← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I vs Honda CR-V 2.4 166

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I is the quicker car, covering it in 16.87 s at 82.5 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.4 166’s 17.67 s — a margin of 0.80 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I takes 8.76 s and the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 9.99 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I Honda CR-V 2.4 166

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma 1.7 125 Mk IHonda CR-V 2.4 166
0–60 mph8.76 s9.99 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.67 s3.08 s
1/8 mile10.92 s11.56 s
1/4 mile16.87 s17.67 s
Trap speed82.5 mph80.7 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/9 for the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I, 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma 1.7 125 Mk IHonda CR-V 2.4 166
Year20002007
Power123 bhp166 bhp
Kerb mass1,040 kg1,537 kg
Power to weight119 bhp/t108 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelHonda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2000s5,151 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I or the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.87 s to the Honda CR-V 2.4 166's 17.67 s, a margin of 0.80 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s against 9.99 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.87 s at 82.5 mph.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I trips the lights at 82.5 mph and the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 at 80.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 9 for the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I and 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.