← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 vs Subaru Forester 2.0 147

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Subaru Forester 2.0 147 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.04 s at 80.3 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.4 166’s 17.67 s — a margin of 0.63 s. To 60 mph the Subaru Forester 2.0 147 takes 9.16 s and the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 9.99 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 Subaru Forester 2.0 147

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHonda CR-V 2.4 166Subaru Forester 2.0 147
0–60 mph9.99 s9.16 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.08 s2.64 s
1/8 mile11.56 s10.90 s
1/4 mile17.67 s17.04 s
Trap speed80.7 mph80.3 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166, 2/2 for the Subaru Forester 2.0 147 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHonda CR-V 2.4 166Subaru Forester 2.0 147
Year20072013
Power166 bhp145 bhp
Kerb mass1,537 kg1,540 kg
Power to weight108 bhp/t94 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelSubaru 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 or the Subaru Forester 2.0 147 faster?
The Subaru Forester 2.0 147. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.04 s to the Honda CR-V 2.4 166's 17.67 s, a margin of 0.63 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.16 s against 9.99 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph.
What is the Subaru Forester 2.0 147 0-60 time?
The Subaru Forester 2.0 147 reaches 60 mph in 9.16 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.04 s at 80.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 trips the lights at 80.7 mph and the Subaru Forester 2.0 147 at 80.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 and 2 of 2 for the Subaru Forester 2.0 147. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.