← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I vs Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I is the quicker car, covering it in 16.87 s at 82.5 mph against the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90’s 19.74 s — a margin of 2.88 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I takes 8.76 s and the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90 12.87 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma 1.7 125 Mk IOpel Tigra 1.4 16V 90
0–60 mph8.76 s12.87 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.67 s3.53 s
1/8 mile10.92 s13.24 s
1/4 mile16.87 s19.74 s
Trap speed82.5 mph76.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/9 for the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I, 2/2 for the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma 1.7 125 Mk IOpel Tigra 1.4 16V 90
Year20001994
Power123 bhp89 bhp
Kerb mass1,040 kg955 kg
Power to weight119 bhp/t93 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelOpel 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,686 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I or the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.87 s to the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90's 19.74 s, a margin of 2.88 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s against 12.87 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.87 s at 82.5 mph.
What is the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90 0-60 time?
The Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90 reaches 60 mph in 12.87 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.74 s at 76.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I trips the lights at 82.5 mph and the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90 at 76.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 9 for the Ford Puma 1.7 125 Mk I and 2 of 2 for the Opel Tigra 1.4 16V 90. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.