← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma ST Mk II vs Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma ST Mk II is the quicker car, covering it in 14.60 s at 94.2 mph against the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132’s 16.53 s — a margin of 1.93 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma ST Mk II takes 5.94 s and the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132 8.36 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma ST Mk II Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma ST Mk IIPeugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132
0–60 mph5.94 s8.36 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.25 s2.57 s
1/8 mile9.38 s10.65 s
1/4 mile14.60 s16.53 s
Trap speed94.2 mph83.7 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/10 for the Ford Puma ST Mk II, 2/2 for the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma ST Mk IIPeugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132
Year20202024
Power197 bhp129 bhp
Kerb mass1,358 kg1,270 kg
Power to weight145 bhp/t101 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 6 seconds3,252 cars0-100 km/h under 7 seconds4,035 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelPeugeot 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2020s868 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma ST Mk II or the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132 faster?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.60 s to the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132's 16.53 s, a margin of 1.93 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 5.94 s against 8.36 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma ST Mk II 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II reaches 60 mph in 5.94 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.60 s at 94.2 mph.
What is the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132 0-60 time?
The Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132 reaches 60 mph in 8.36 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.53 s at 83.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II trips the lights at 94.2 mph and the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132 at 83.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 10 for the Ford Puma ST Mk II and 2 of 2 for the Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 132. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.