Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 vs Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 is the quicker car,
covering it in 18.45 s at
74.6 mph against the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105’s
18.79 s — a margin of
0.33 s. To 60 mph the Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 takes
11.58 s and the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105
11.35 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83
Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105
0–60 mph
11.58 s
11.35 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.94 s
3.35 s
1/8 mile
11.85 s
12.48 s
1/4 mile
18.45 s
18.79 s
Trap speed
74.6 mph
78.4 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83,
2/2 for the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 or the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105 faster?
The Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 18.45 s to the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105's 18.79 s, a margin of 0.33 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 11.58 s against 11.35 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 0-60 time?
The Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 reaches 60 mph in 11.58 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.45 s at 74.6 mph.
What is the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105 0-60 time?
The Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105 reaches 60 mph in 11.35 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.79 s at 78.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 trips the lights at 74.6 mph and the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105 at 78.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda Civic Sedan 1.3 83 and 2 of 2 for the Mazda 3 / Axela Sedan 1.6 105. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.