← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph against the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150’s 18.35 s — a margin of 0.69 s. To 60 mph the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 takes 9.99 s and the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 11.39 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHonda CR-V 2.4 166Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150
0–60 mph9.99 s11.39 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.08 s3.01 s
1/8 mile11.56 s11.87 s
1/4 mile17.67 s18.35 s
Trap speed80.7 mph75.9 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166, 2/2 for the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHonda CR-V 2.4 166Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150
Year20072012
Power166 bhp148 bhp
Kerb mass1,537 kg1,560 kg
Power to weight108 bhp/t95 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelMitsubishi 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 or the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 faster?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.67 s to the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150's 18.35 s, a margin of 0.69 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s against 11.39 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph.
What is the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 reaches 60 mph in 11.39 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.35 s at 75.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 trips the lights at 80.7 mph and the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 at 75.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 and 2 of 2 for the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.