Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 vs Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 is the quicker car,
covering it in 15.47 s at
86.1 mph against the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285’s
16.51 s — a margin of
1.04 s. To 60 mph the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 takes
7.01 s and the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285
8.23 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Hyundai Kona 1.6 177Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Hyundai Kona 1.6 177
Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285
0–60 mph
7.01 s
8.23 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.15 s
2.91 s
1/8 mile
9.77 s
10.89 s
1/4 mile
15.47 s
16.51 s
Trap speed
86.1 mph
88.0 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177,
2/2 for the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 or the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285 faster?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.47 s to the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285's 16.51 s, a margin of 1.04 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.01 s against 8.23 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 0-60 time?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 reaches 60 mph in 7.01 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.47 s at 86.1 mph.
What is the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285 0-60 time?
The Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285 reaches 60 mph in 8.23 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.51 s at 88.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 trips the lights at 86.1 mph and the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285 at 88.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 and 2 of 2 for the Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4.2 285. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.