← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 vs Mazda CX-3 1.5 105

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.53 s at 78.3 mph against the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105’s 17.82 s — a margin of 0.29 s. To 60 mph the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 takes 10.17 s and the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 10.68 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 Mazda CX-3 1.5 105

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startLand Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150Mazda CX-3 1.5 105
0–60 mph10.17 s10.68 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.61 s2.59 s
1/8 mile11.24 s11.30 s
1/4 mile17.53 s17.82 s
Trap speed78.3 mph75.4 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150, 2/2 for the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150Mazda CX-3 1.5 105
Year20112015
Power148 bhp105 bhp
Kerb mass1,595 kg1,370 kg
Power to weight92 bhp/t76 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Land Rover 0-60 timesevery modelMazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest diesel cars4,038 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 or the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 faster?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.53 s to the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105's 17.82 s, a margin of 0.29 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.17 s against 10.68 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 0-60 time?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 reaches 60 mph in 10.17 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.53 s at 78.3 mph.
What is the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 0-60 time?
The Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 reaches 60 mph in 10.68 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.82 s at 75.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 trips the lights at 78.3 mph and the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 at 75.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 and 2 of 2 for the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.