← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 vs Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift is the quicker car, covering it in 16.05 s at 89.5 mph against the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150’s 17.53 s — a margin of 1.49 s. To 60 mph the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift takes 7.77 s and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 10.17 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startLand Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift
0–60 mph10.17 s7.77 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.61 s2.70 s
1/8 mile11.24 s10.48 s
1/4 mile17.53 s16.05 s
Trap speed78.3 mph89.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150, 9/9 for the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift
Year20112007
Power148 bhp286 bhp
Kerb mass1,595 kg2,160 kg
Power to weight92 bhp/t132 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,521 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Land Rover 0-60 timesevery modelPorsche 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 or the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift faster?
The Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.05 s to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150's 17.53 s, a margin of 1.49 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.77 s against 10.17 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 0-60 time?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 reaches 60 mph in 10.17 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.53 s at 78.3 mph.
What is the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift 0-60 time?
The Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift reaches 60 mph in 7.77 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.05 s at 89.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 trips the lights at 78.3 mph and the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift at 89.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 and 9 of 9 for the Porsche Cayenne Mk I facelift. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.