← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Lotus Emira 2.0 365 vs Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 is the quicker car, covering it in 12.26 s at 116.2 mph against the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392’s 12.98 s — a margin of 0.72 s. To 60 mph the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 takes 3.93 s and the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 4.45 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Lotus Emira 2.0 365 Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startLotus Emira 2.0 365Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392
0–60 mph3.93 s4.45 s
0–100 mph9.20 s10.72 s
60 ft1.95 s2.12 s
1/8 mile7.97 s8.46 s
1/4 mile12.26 s12.98 s
Trap speed116.2 mph111.7 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Lotus Emira 2.0 365, 9/10 for the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationLotus Emira 2.0 365Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392
Year20222011
Power361 bhp471 bhp
Kerb mass1,446 kg1,933 kg
Power to weight249 bhp/t244 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveRear drive
EngineTurbochargedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 5 seconds1,846 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,639 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,964 carsTraps over 110 mph1,380 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Lotus 0-60 timesevery modelDodge 0-60 timesevery model

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 or the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 faster?
The Lotus Emira 2.0 365. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 12.26 s to the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392's 12.98 s, a margin of 0.72 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.93 s against 4.45 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 0-60 time?
The Lotus Emira 2.0 365 reaches 60 mph in 3.93 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.26 s at 116.2 mph.
What is the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 0-60 time?
The Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 reaches 60 mph in 4.45 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.98 s at 111.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Lotus Emira 2.0 365 trips the lights at 116.2 mph and the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 at 111.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 and 9 of 10 for the Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.