Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) is the quicker car,
covering it in 16.42 s at
85.6 mph against the Mazda 2 1.6 95’s
17.77 s — a margin of
1.35 s. To 60 mph the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) takes
8.33 s and the Mazda 2 1.6 95
10.39 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Mazda 2 1.6 95Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014)
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Mazda 2 1.6 95
Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014)
0–60 mph
10.39 s
8.33 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.75 s
2.53 s
1/8 mile
11.36 s
10.58 s
1/4 mile
17.77 s
16.42 s
Trap speed
77.0 mph
85.6 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Mazda 2 1.6 95,
2/2 for the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Mazda 2 1.6 95 or the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) faster?
The Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.42 s to the Mazda 2 1.6 95's 17.77 s, a margin of 1.35 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.33 s against 10.39 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mazda 2 1.6 95 0-60 time?
The Mazda 2 1.6 95 reaches 60 mph in 10.39 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.77 s at 77.0 mph.
What is the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) 0-60 time?
The Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) reaches 60 mph in 8.33 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.42 s at 85.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mazda 2 1.6 95 trips the lights at 77.0 mph and the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) at 85.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mazda 2 1.6 95 and 2 of 2 for the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.