← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.56 s at 81.5 mph against the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020)’s 16.57 s — a margin of 0.01 s. To 60 mph the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 takes 8.72 s and the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020) 8.63 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startSkoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020)
0–60 mph8.72 s8.63 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.42 s2.29 s
1/8 mile10.53 s10.48 s
1/4 mile16.56 s16.57 s
Trap speed81.5 mph80.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150, 2/2 for the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020)
Year20162020
Power148 bhp161 bhp
Kerb mass1,625 kg1,951 kg
Power to weight91 bhp/t82 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Skoda 0-60 timesevery modelJaguar 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 or the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020) faster?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.56 s to the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020)'s 16.57 s, a margin of 0.01 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.72 s against 8.63 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 0-60 time?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 reaches 60 mph in 8.72 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.56 s at 81.5 mph.
What is the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020) 0-60 time?
The Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020) reaches 60 mph in 8.63 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.57 s at 80.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 trips the lights at 81.5 mph and the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020) at 80.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 and 2 of 2 for the Jaguar F-Pace 2.0 163 (2020). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.