← My Auto Racer All cars Chevrolet 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145

The Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s (100 km/h in 9.30 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.71 s, tripping the lights at 82.9 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.71 s and the eighth mile in 10.77 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 Kia Optima Sportswagon 1.7 CRDi 141

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145
0–60 mph8.76 s
0–100 km/h9.30 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.71 s
1/8 mile10.77 s
1/4 mile16.71 s
Trap speed82.9 mph

About the Epica 2.0i 145

The 2006 Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 is a front-drive turbocharged saloon of 1,560 kg with 143 bhp, which works out at 92 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.71 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 7,980th quickest to 60 mph, and the 107th quickest of the 199 Chevrolets here. Its 82.9 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145
Year2006
Power143 hp (107 kW)
Kerb mass1,560 kg
Power to weight92 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed124 mph (200 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Kia Optima Sportswagon 1.7 CRDi 14120168.75 s16.77 s82.1 mph139 bhp
Alfa Romeo Giulia 2.2 JTDM 13620168.75 s16.75 s83.2 mph134 bhp
Volvo S80 2.0 D3 16320098.71 s16.72 s82.9 mph161 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Chevrolet 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 0-60 time?
The Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 7,980th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 quarter mile time?
16.71 s at 82.9 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.77 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.71 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 have?
143 bhp and 1,560 kg, which is 92 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 200 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145?
Closest here on pace: Kia Optima Sportswagon 1.7 CRDi 141 (8.75 s), Alfa Romeo Giulia 2.2 JTDM 136 (8.75 s), Volvo S80 2.0 D3 163 (8.71 s). Each one can be raced against the Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Chevrolet Epica 2.0i 145 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.