← My Auto Racer All cars Chevrolet 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141

The Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 reaches 60 mph in 10.65 s (100 km/h in 11.35 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.82 s, tripping the lights at 76.6 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.73 s and the eighth mile in 11.41 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 Renault Scenic 1.2 TCe 115 (2013)

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141
0–60 mph10.65 s
0–100 km/h11.35 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.73 s
1/8 mile11.41 s
1/4 mile17.82 s
Trap speed76.6 mph

About the Orlando 1.8 141

The 2010 Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 is a front-drive turbocharged MPV of 1,539 kg with 138 bhp, which works out at 90 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.73 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 11,180th quickest to 60 mph, and the 151st quickest of the 199 Chevrolets here. Its 76.6 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141
Year2010
Power138 hp (103 kW)
Kerb mass1,539 kg
Power to weight90 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed115 mph (185 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Renault Scenic 1.2 TCe 115 (2013)201310.63 s17.75 s77.1 mph113 bhp
Vauxhall Meriva 1.4 ecoFLEX bi-fuel 120201410.71 s17.90 s77.0 mph118 bhp
Vauxhall Meriva 1.7 CDTi 110 (2010)201010.72 s17.82 s76.8 mph109 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Chevrolet 0-60 timesevery modelFastest MPVs and people carriers478 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 0-60 time?
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 reaches 60 mph in 10.65 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 11,180th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 quarter mile time?
17.82 s at 76.6 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.41 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.73 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 have?
138 bhp and 1,539 kg, which is 90 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 185 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141?
Closest here on pace: Renault Scenic 1.2 TCe 115 (2013) (10.63 s), Vauxhall Meriva 1.4 ecoFLEX bi-fuel 120 (10.71 s), Vauxhall Meriva 1.7 CDTi 110 (2010) (10.72 s). Each one can be raced against the Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 141 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.