← My Auto Racer All cars Chrysler 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235

The Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 reaches 60 mph in 9.05 s (100 km/h in 9.61 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.05 s, tripping the lights at 81.9 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.88 s and the eighth mile in 11.05 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 Renault Koleos 2.0 Blue dCi CVT 190

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235
0–60 mph9.05 s
0–100 km/h9.61 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.88 s
1/8 mile11.05 s
1/4 mile17.05 s
Trap speed81.9 mph

About the Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235

The 2006 Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 is a rear-drive naturally aspirated SUV of 2,204 kg with 235 bhp, which works out at 106 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 106 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 2.88 s. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,526th quickest to 60 mph, and the 44th quickest of the 76 Chryslers here. Its 81.9 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235
Year2006
Power235 hp (175 kW)
Kerb mass2,204 kg
Power to weight106 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed112 mph (180 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Renault Koleos 2.0 Blue dCi CVT 19020199.08 s16.97 s80.9 mph188 bhp
Kia Seltos 2.0 CVT 14820249.07 s16.98 s80.5 mph146 bhp
Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDI 13020209.08 s16.97 s81.6 mph129 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Chrysler 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 0-60 time?
The Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 reaches 60 mph in 9.05 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,526th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 quarter mile time?
17.05 s at 81.9 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.05 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.88 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 have?
235 bhp and 2,204 kg, which is 106 bhp per tonne. It is rear-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 180 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235?
Closest here on pace: Renault Koleos 2.0 Blue dCi CVT 190 (9.08 s), Kia Seltos 2.0 CVT 148 (9.07 s), Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDI 130 (9.08 s). Each one can be raced against the Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Chrysler Aspen 4.7 V8 2WD 235 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.