← My Auto Racer All cars Citroen 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150

The Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s (100 km/h in 10.59 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.43 s, tripping the lights at 79.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.81 s and the eighth mile in 11.23 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 Vauxhall Meriva 1.4 Turbo 140

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150
0–60 mph9.99 s
0–100 km/h10.59 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.81 s
1/8 mile11.23 s
1/4 mile17.43 s
Trap speed79.2 mph

About the Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150

The 1998 Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 is a front-drive turbocharged MPV of 1,550 kg with 148 bhp, which works out at 95 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.81 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 10,121st quickest to 60 mph, and the 101st quickest of the 387 Citroens here. Its 79.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150
Year1998
Power148 hp (110 kW)
Kerb mass1,550 kg
Power to weight95 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed121 mph (195 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Vauxhall Meriva 1.4 Turbo 140201410.03 s17.43 s78.5 mph138 bhp
Toyota Verso 1.8 Valvematic CVT 14720139.98 s17.56 s78.2 mph145 bhp
Honda Stream 1.7 131 (2000)200010.07 s17.51 s78.7 mph129 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Citroen 0-60 timesevery modelFastest MPVs and people carriers478 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 0-60 time?
The Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 10,121st quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 quarter mile time?
17.43 s at 79.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.23 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.81 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 have?
148 bhp and 1,550 kg, which is 95 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 195 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150?
Closest here on pace: Vauxhall Meriva 1.4 Turbo 140 (10.03 s), Toyota Verso 1.8 Valvematic CVT 147 (9.98 s), Honda Stream 1.7 131 (2000) (10.07 s). Each one can be raced against the Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Citroen Evasion 2.0 Turbo 150 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.