← My Auto Racer All cars Citroen 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992)

The Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) reaches 60 mph in 9.29 s (100 km/h in 9.82 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.10 s, tripping the lights at 82.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.87 s and the eighth mile in 11.11 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) Kia Rio Hatchback 1.6 112

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992)
0–60 mph9.29 s
0–100 km/h9.82 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.87 s
1/8 mile11.11 s
1/4 mile17.10 s
Trap speed82.2 mph

About the ZX 3dr 1.8i 103

The 1992 Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 988 kg with 102 bhp, which works out at 103 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.87 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,933rd quickest to 60 mph, and the 74th quickest of the 387 Citroens here. Its 82.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992)
Year1992
Power102 hp (76 kW)
Kerb mass988 kg
Power to weight103 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed117 mph (188 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Kia Rio Hatchback 1.6 11220099.29 s17.10 s82.2 mph110 bhp
Kia Rio Hatchback 1.6 16V 11220059.29 s17.10 s82.2 mph110 bhp
Lancia Trevi 2.0 12219819.28 s17.14 s81.5 mph121 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Citroen 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,513 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) 0-60 time?
The Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) reaches 60 mph in 9.29 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,933rd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) quarter mile time?
17.10 s at 82.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.11 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.87 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) have?
102 bhp and 988 kg, which is 103 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 188 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992)?
Closest here on pace: Kia Rio Hatchback 1.6 112 (9.29 s), Kia Rio Hatchback 1.6 16V 112 (9.29 s), Lancia Trevi 2.0 122 (9.28 s). Each one can be raced against the Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Citroen ZX 3dr 1.8i 103 (1992) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.