← My Auto Racer All cars Dacia 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101

The Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 reaches 60 mph in 11.96 s (100 km/h in 12.74 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.53 s, tripping the lights at 73.5 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.74 s and the eighth mile in 11.85 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 SEAT Arona 1.0 TGI 90

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101
0–60 mph11.96 s
0–100 km/h12.74 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.74 s
1/8 mile11.85 s
1/4 mile18.53 s
Trap speed73.5 mph

About the Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101

The 2023 Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 is a front-drive turbocharged SUV of 1,252 kg with 90 bhp, which works out at 72 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.74 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 12,802nd quickest to 60 mph, and the 43rd quickest of the 93 Dacias here. Its 73.5 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101
Year2023
Power90 hp (67 kW)
Kerb mass1,252 kg
Power to weight72 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed109 mph (175 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
SEAT Arona 1.0 TGI 90202111.97 s18.50 s73.6 mph89 bhp
Ssangyong Rexton RX 200e-XDi 155200611.93 s18.47 s73.1 mph153 bhp
Suzuki Grand Vitara 5dr 1.9 DDiS 129200811.92 s18.65 s73.6 mph127 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Dacia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2020s867 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 0-60 time?
The Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 reaches 60 mph in 11.96 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 12,802nd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 quarter mile time?
18.53 s at 73.5 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.85 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.74 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 have?
90 bhp and 1,252 kg, which is 72 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 175 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101?
Closest here on pace: SEAT Arona 1.0 TGI 90 (11.97 s), Ssangyong Rexton RX 200e-XDi 155 (11.93 s), Suzuki Grand Vitara 5dr 1.9 DDiS 129 (11.92 s). Each one can be raced against the Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Dacia Jogger 1.0 TCe EGO-G 7 Seats 101 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.