← My Auto Racer All cars Daewoo 0-60 Comparisons Answers
The Daewoo Matiz 1.0 64 reaches 60 mph in 13.86 s (100 km/h in 14.83 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 19.59 s, tripping the lights at 71.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.24 s and the eighth mile in 12.64 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.
| Standing start | Daewoo Matiz 1.0 64 |
|---|---|
| 0–60 mph | 13.86 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 14.83 s |
| 0–100 mph | — |
| 60 ft | 3.24 s |
| 1/8 mile | 12.64 s |
| 1/4 mile | 19.59 s |
| Trap speed | 71.0 mph |
The 2001 Daewoo Matiz 1.0 64 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 795 kg with 63 bhp, which works out at 79 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.24 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 14,059th quickest to 60 mph, and the 41st quickest of the 45 Daewoos here. Its 71.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.
| Specification | Daewoo Matiz 1.0 64 |
|---|---|
| Year | 2001 |
| Power | 63 hp (47 kW) |
| Kerb mass | 795 kg |
| Power to weight | 79 bhp/t |
| Drivetrain | Front drive |
| Gears | 5 |
| Engine | Naturally aspirated |
| Top speed | 94 mph (152 km/h), quoted |
| Car | Year | 0–60 | 1/4 mile | Trap | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacia 1320 1.4 65 | 1988 | 13.95 s | 19.62 s | 70.7 mph | 64 bhp |
| Fiat Uno 1.0 65 | 2010 | 13.67 s | 19.49 s | 71.2 mph | 64 bhp |
| Daihatsu Sirion 1.0 55 | 2001 | 13.93 s | 19.58 s | 70.3 mph | 54 bhp |
Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.