What is the fastest Daewoo model?

The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 (2006), which reaches 60 mph in 5.11 s. It is the quickest of the 46 Daewoo models listed here. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.

Which Daewoo model is quickest over the quarter mile?

The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 again, in 13.89 s at 98.9 mph — it leads both the 0-60 and the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.

Which Daewoo model has the highest trap speed?

The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 at 98.9 mph through the quarter-mile lights. Trap speed tracks power against weight, so it rewards a different car from the one that launches best. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.

How many Daewoo models are listed?

46, ranked by simulated 0-60 mph time, from the Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 at 5.11 s to the Daewoo Matiz 0.8 52 (2005) at 16.48 s.

Are these real measured times?

No. Every figure here is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces its own published acceleration figures. Because every car is run in identical conditions — dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout — the ranking is a fair comparison even though no individual time is a timing slip.

← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Daewoo 0-60 times

All 46 Daewoo models in the set, quickest to 60 mph first. The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 leads at 5.11 s.

The quickest Daewoo of the 46 listed here is the Daewoo G2X 2.0 264, which reaches 60 mph in 5.11 s and covers the standing quarter mile in 13.89 s. The slowest here is the Daewoo Matiz 0.8 52 (2005) at 16.48 s.

Simulated, not measured — every car computed from its published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 Daewoo Winstorm 3.2 V6 230

Starts with the two quickest on this list. Pick any two from the list below, shuffle for a random pair, or change the surface, the weather and the distance once it is running.

Every one, quickest first

#	Car	Year	0–60	1/4 mile	Trap	Power
1	G2X 2.0 264	2006	5.11 s	13.89 s	98.9 mph	260 bhp
2	Winstorm 3.2 V6 230	2006	7.96 s	16.27 s	86.2 mph	227 bhp
3	Nubira Hatchback 2	2000	8.19 s	16.28 s	86.6 mph	131 bhp
4	Tosca 2.0 D 150	2006	8.81 s	16.63 s	83.0 mph	148 bhp
5	Lacetti 5dr 2.0 D 121	2003	8.88 s	16.77 s	82.0 mph	119 bhp
6	Lacetti 5dr 1.8 121	2003	8.93 s	16.81 s	83.9 mph	119 bhp
7	Tosca 2.5 160	2006	8.98 s	16.97 s	84.7 mph	157 bhp
8	Tosca 2.0 145	2006	9.03 s	16.84 s	84.6 mph	143 bhp
9	Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122	2004	9.37 s	17.20 s	81.3 mph	121 bhp
10	Magnus 2.0 130	2002	9.45 s	17.41 s	85.0 mph	129 bhp
11	Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 127	2000	9.56 s	17.33 s	80.8 mph	126 bhp
12	Lacetti 1.6 109	2002	9.75 s	17.42 s	80.9 mph	107 bhp
13	Espero 2.0 105	1990	9.84 s	17.49 s	80.5 mph	103 bhp
14	Espero 1.8 95	1990	10.02 s	17.63 s	79.6 mph	94 bhp
15	Lacetti 1.5 107	2002	10.02 s	17.62 s	79.9 mph	105 bhp
16	Nubira Hatchback 1.6	2000	10.03 s	17.61 s	80.1 mph	105 bhp
17	Nubira Sedan 1.6 16V 106	1997	10.03 s	17.61 s	80.1 mph	105 bhp
18	Nubira 1.6 106	2000	10.03 s	17.61 s	80.1 mph	105 bhp
19	Nubira Sedan 2.0 133	1997	10.09 s	17.89 s	82.7 mph	131 bhp
20	Gentra 1.4 90	2005	10.10 s	17.70 s	79.1 mph	94 bhp
21	Winstorm 2.4 141	2006	10.47 s	17.94 s	78.1 mph	139 bhp
22	Lanos Hatchback 3dr 1.6 107	1996	10.48 s	17.92 s	78.6 mph	105 bhp
23	Lanos 1.6 106	1996	10.48 s	17.92 s	78.6 mph	105 bhp
24	Lacetti 1.4 95	2002	10.56 s	18.00 s	77.9 mph	94 bhp
25	Tacuma/Rezzo 1.6 105	2000	10.72 s	18.14 s	76.8 mph	103 bhp
26	Lacetti Wagon 1.8 122	2003	10.91 s	18.48 s	80.1 mph	121 bhp
27	Tacuma/Rezzo 1.8 101	2004	10.92 s	18.24 s	76.7 mph	99 bhp
28	Tacuma/Rezzo 1.8 101	2000	10.94 s	18.21 s	77.6 mph	99 bhp
29	Leganza 2.2 136	1997	10.95 s	18.46 s	81.7 mph	134 bhp
30	Leganza 2.0 146	1997	10.95 s	18.46 s	81.9 mph	143 bhp
31	Tacuma/Rezzo 1.6 107	2004	11.09 s	18.36 s	76.1 mph	106 bhp
32	Lacetti 5dr 1.5 106	2003	11.19 s	18.66 s	79.5 mph	105 bhp
33	Winstorm 2.0 D 152	2006	11.30 s	18.34 s	75.8 mph	150 bhp
34	Lanos 1.5 86	1996	11.38 s	18.51 s	76.0 mph	84 bhp
35	Lanos Hatchback 3dr 1.5 86	1996	11.38 s	18.51 s	76.0 mph	84 bhp
36	Espero 1.5 90	1990	11.65 s	18.68 s	75.3 mph	89 bhp
37	Cielo/Nexia 1.5 CNG 71	1994	11.75 s	18.43 s	73.6 mph	70 bhp
38	Matiz 1.0 67	2005	12.20 s	19.03 s	73.0 mph	66 bhp
39	Cielo/Nexia 1.5 90	1994	13.28 s	19.99 s	74.3 mph	89 bhp
40	Lanos 1.3 75	1996	13.66 s	19.82 s	71.5 mph	74 bhp
41	Lanos Hatchback 3dr 1.3 75	1996	13.66 s	19.82 s	71.5 mph	74 bhp
42	Matiz 1.0 64	2001	13.86 s	19.59 s	71.0 mph	63 bhp
43	Cielo/Nexia 1.5 90	1994	14.35 s	20.58 s	71.9 mph	74 bhp
44	Matiz 0.8 52	2001	15.39 s	20.29 s	68.3 mph	51 bhp
45	Tico 0.8	1991	15.84 s	20.50 s	67.7 mph	40 bhp
46	Matiz 0.8 52	2005	16.48 s	20.82 s	67.1 mph	51 bhp

Tap + on any two rows to put them on the line together, or the name for that car’s own figures.

Questions

What is the fastest Daewoo model?: The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 (2006), which reaches 60 mph in 5.11 s. It is the quickest of the 46 Daewoo models listed here. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Which Daewoo model is quickest over the quarter mile?: The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 again, in 13.89 s at 98.9 mph — it leads both the 0-60 and the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Which Daewoo model has the highest trap speed?: The Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 at 98.9 mph through the quarter-mile lights. Trap speed tracks power against weight, so it rewards a different car from the one that launches best. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How many Daewoo models are listed?: 46, ranked by simulated 0-60 mph time, from the Daewoo G2X 2.0 264 at 5.11 s to the Daewoo Matiz 0.8 52 (2005) at 16.48 s.
Are these real measured times?: No. Every figure here is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces its own published acceleration figures. Because every car is run in identical conditions — dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout — the ranking is a fair comparison even though no individual time is a timing slip.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.