← My Auto Racer All cars Daewoo 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145

The Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 reaches 60 mph in 9.03 s (100 km/h in 9.53 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.84 s, tripping the lights at 84.6 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.90 s and the eighth mile in 11.03 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 Mazda 626 (Mk.5) Sedan 2.0 115

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145
0–60 mph9.03 s
0–100 km/h9.53 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.90 s
1/8 mile11.03 s
1/4 mile16.84 s
Trap speed84.6 mph

About the Tosca 2.0 145

The 2006 Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 is a front-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,450 kg with 143 bhp, which works out at 99 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.90 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,492nd quickest to 60 mph, and the 8th quickest of the 45 Daewoos here. It traps higher than its 0-60 suggests — 84.6 mph, the 7,506th highest here — so it is a car that keeps going rather than one that simply leaves well. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145
Year2006
Power143 hp (107 kW)
Kerb mass1,450 kg
Power to weight99 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed129 mph (207 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Mazda 626 (Mk.5) Sedan 2.0 11519979.02 s16.87 s83.9 mph114 bhp
Nissan Primera Sedan 2.0 16V 11619909.02 s16.86 s84.0 mph114 bhp
Lancia Lybra Sedan 2.4 JTD 13419998.99 s16.75 s82.4 mph133 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Daewoo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 0-60 time?
The Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 reaches 60 mph in 9.03 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,492nd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 quarter mile time?
16.84 s at 84.6 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.03 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.90 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 have?
143 bhp and 1,450 kg, which is 99 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 207 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145?
Closest here on pace: Mazda 626 (Mk.5) Sedan 2.0 115 (9.02 s), Nissan Primera Sedan 2.0 16V 116 (9.02 s), Lancia Lybra Sedan 2.4 JTD 134 (8.99 s). Each one can be raced against the Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Daewoo Tosca 2.0 145 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.