← My Auto Racer All cars Fiat 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132

The Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 reaches 60 mph in 8.83 s (100 km/h in 9.33 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.78 s, tripping the lights at 83.6 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.78 s and the eighth mile in 10.88 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2.0 130

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132
0–60 mph8.83 s
0–100 km/h9.33 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.78 s
1/8 mile10.88 s
1/4 mile16.78 s
Trap speed83.6 mph

About the Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132

The 2017 Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,223 kg with 137 bhp, which works out at 112 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.78 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,091st quickest to 60 mph, and the 77th quickest of the 455 Fiats here. Its 83.6 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132
Year2017
Power137 hp (102 kW)
Kerb mass1,223 kg
Power to weight112 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed117 mph (188 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2.0 13019798.83 s16.80 s83.2 mph129 bhp
Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2.0 13119728.83 s16.80 s83.2 mph129 bhp
Alfa Romeo Alfetta GT 1.8 12119748.84 s16.75 s84.1 mph119 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Fiat 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,681 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 0-60 time?
The Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 reaches 60 mph in 8.83 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,091st quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 quarter mile time?
16.78 s at 83.6 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.88 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.78 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 have?
137 bhp and 1,223 kg, which is 112 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 188 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132?
Closest here on pace: Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2.0 130 (8.83 s), Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2.0 131 (8.83 s), Alfa Romeo Alfetta GT 1.8 121 (8.84 s). Each one can be raced against the Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Fiat Argo 1.8 E-Torq 132 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.