← My Auto Racer All cars Ford 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3)

The Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) reaches 60 mph in 10.38 s (100 km/h in 10.99 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.56 s, tripping the lights at 78.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.68 s and the eighth mile in 11.31 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) Lancia Voyager 2.8 178

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3)
0–60 mph10.38 s
0–100 km/h10.99 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.68 s
1/8 mile11.31 s
1/4 mile17.56 s
Trap speed78.2 mph

About the Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3)

The 2015 Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) is a front-drive turbodiesel MPV of 1,791 kg with 148 bhp, which works out at 82 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.68 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 10,743rd quickest to 60 mph, and the 479th quickest of the 789 Fords here. Its 78.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3)
Year2015
Power148 hp (110 kW)
Kerb mass1,791 kg
Power to weight82 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbodiesel
Top speed119 mph (192 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Lancia Voyager 2.8 178201110.39 s17.64 s78.1 mph176 bhp
Toyota Verso 2.0 D-4D 126 (2013)201310.27 s17.55 s78.2 mph123 bhp
Toyota Corolla Verso 2.0 D-4D 126200710.27 s17.55 s78.2 mph125 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Ford Focus RS (2009) vs Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3)Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelFastest MPVs and people carriers478 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) 0-60 time?
The Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) reaches 60 mph in 10.38 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 10,743rd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) quarter mile time?
17.56 s at 78.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.31 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.68 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) have?
148 bhp and 1,791 kg, which is 82 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbodiesel, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 192 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3)?
Closest here on pace: Lancia Voyager 2.8 178 (10.39 s), Toyota Verso 2.0 D-4D 126 (2013) (10.27 s), Toyota Corolla Verso 2.0 D-4D 126 (10.27 s). Each one can be raced against the Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi 150 (Mk3) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.