← My Auto Racer All cars Jaguar 0-60 Comparisons Answers
The Jaguar XJ 3.2 200 reaches 60 mph in 7.71 s (100 km/h in 8.64 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.21 s, tripping the lights at 87.6 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.77 s and the eighth mile in 10.60 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.
| Standing start | Jaguar XJ 3.2 200 |
|---|---|
| 0–60 mph | 7.71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.64 s |
| 0–100 mph | — |
| 60 ft | 2.77 s |
| 1/8 mile | 10.60 s |
| 1/4 mile | 16.21 s |
| Trap speed | 87.6 mph |
The 1986 Jaguar XJ 3.2 200 is a rear-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,700 kg with 197 bhp, which works out at 116 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 116 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 2.77 s. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 5,954th quickest to 60 mph, and the 157th quickest of the 187 Jaguars here. Its 87.6 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.
| Specification | Jaguar XJ 3.2 200 |
|---|---|
| Year | 1986 |
| Power | 197 hp (147 kW) |
| Kerb mass | 1,700 kg |
| Power to weight | 116 bhp/t |
| Drivetrain | Rear drive |
| Gears | 5 |
| Engine | Naturally aspirated |
| Top speed | 131 mph (211 km/h), quoted |
| Car | Year | 0–60 | 1/4 mile | Trap | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo 156 Sportwagon 2.0 TS 150 | 2000 | 7.72 s | 16.20 s | 88.0 mph | 148 bhp |
| Nissan Leaf 52kWh | 2025 | 7.66 s | 16.15 s | 81.3 mph | 174 bhp |
| SEAT Altea 2.0 TDI 170 | 2004 | 7.78 s | 16.09 s | 86.1 mph | 168 bhp |
Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.