← My Auto Racer All cars Kia 0-60 Comparisons Answers
The Kia Pro Ceed 2.0 CVVT Mk I reaches 60 mph in 8.39 s and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.58 s, tripping the lights at 84.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.70 s and the eighth mile in 10.74 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.
| Standing start | Kia Pro Ceed 2.0 CVVT Mk I |
|---|---|
| 0–60 mph | 8.39 s |
| 0–100 mph | — |
| 60 ft | 2.70 s |
| 1/8 mile | 10.74 s |
| 1/4 mile | 16.58 s |
| Trap speed | 84.3 mph |
The 2008 Kia Pro Ceed 2.0 CVVT Mk I is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,342 kg with 141 bhp, which works out at 105 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.70 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 2,939 cars in the set it is the 2,711th quickest to 60 mph, and the 12th quickest of the 16 Kias here. Its 84.3 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 9 of 9 published acceleration figures for this car.
| Specification | Kia Pro Ceed 2.0 CVVT Mk I |
|---|---|
| Year | 2008 |
| Power | 141 bhp |
| Kerb mass | 1,342 kg |
| Power to weight | 105 bhp/t |
| Drivetrain | Front drive |
| Gears | 6 |
| Engine | Naturally aspirated |
| Top speed | 205 km/h |
| Car | Year | 0–60 | 1/4 mile | Trap | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 | 2008 | 8.36 s | 16.58 s | 83.6 mph | 152 bhp |
| Alfa Romeo 147 1.9 JTD M-Jet | 2005 | 8.37 s | 16.58 s | 86.0 mph | 148 bhp |
| Rover Metro GTI | 1990 | 8.43 s | 16.50 s | 85.0 mph | 95 bhp |
Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.
Figures regenerated 2026-09-02. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.