← My Auto Racer All cars Kia 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Kia Venga 1.4 90

The Kia Venga 1.4 90 reaches 60 mph in 11.64 s (100 km/h in 12.37 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.69 s, tripping the lights at 75.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.13 s and the eighth mile in 12.11 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Kia Venga 1.4 90 Suzuki Ignis 1.2 DualJet 83

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Kia Venga 1.4 90
0–60 mph11.64 s
0–100 km/h12.37 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.13 s
1/8 mile12.11 s
1/4 mile18.69 s
Trap speed75.0 mph

About the Venga 1.4 90

The 2009 Kia Venga 1.4 90 is a front-drive naturally aspirated SUV of 1,178 kg with 89 bhp, which works out at 75 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.13 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 12,399th quickest to 60 mph, and the 155th quickest of the 205 Kias here. Its 75.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Kia Venga 1.4 90
Year2009
Power89 hp (66 kW)
Kerb mass1,178 kg
Power to weight75 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed104 mph (167 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Suzuki Ignis 1.2 DualJet 83201911.64 s18.69 s74.9 mph82 bhp
Mitsubishi Pajero/Montero/Shogun SWB 3.2 DI-D 160 (2006)200611.59 s18.45 s74.6 mph158 bhp
Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)201311.76 s18.58 s73.4 mph103 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 vs Kia Venga 1.4 90Full comparisonKia Picanto 1.0 67 vs Kia Venga 1.4 90Full comparisonKia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 (Mk3) vs Kia Venga 1.4 90Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Kia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Kia Venga 1.4 90 0-60 time?
The Kia Venga 1.4 90 reaches 60 mph in 11.64 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 12,399th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Kia Venga 1.4 90 quarter mile time?
18.69 s at 75.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 12.11 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.13 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Kia Venga 1.4 90 have?
89 bhp and 1,178 kg, which is 75 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 167 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Kia Venga 1.4 90?
Closest here on pace: Suzuki Ignis 1.2 DualJet 83 (11.64 s), Mitsubishi Pajero/Montero/Shogun SWB 3.2 DI-D 160 (2006) (11.59 s), Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) (11.76 s). Each one can be raced against the Kia Venga 1.4 90 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Kia Venga 1.4 90 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.