← My Auto Racer All cars Lancia 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Lancia Delta 2.0 139

The Lancia Delta 2.0 139 reaches 60 mph in 8.75 s (100 km/h in 9.24 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.64 s, tripping the lights at 85.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.85 s and the eighth mile in 10.88 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Lancia Delta 2.0 139 Mazda 626 (Mk.5) Hatchback 2.0 136

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Lancia Delta 2.0 139
0–60 mph8.75 s
0–100 km/h9.24 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.85 s
1/8 mile10.88 s
1/4 mile16.64 s
Trap speed85.3 mph

About the Delta 2.0 139

The 1993 Lancia Delta 2.0 139 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,215 kg with 137 bhp, which works out at 113 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.85 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 7,945th quickest to 60 mph, and the 43rd quickest of the 150 Lancias here. Its 85.3 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Lancia Delta 2.0 139
Year1993
Power137 hp (102 kW)
Kerb mass1,215 kg
Power to weight113 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed128 mph (206 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Mazda 626 (Mk.5) Hatchback 2.0 13619978.75 s16.64 s85.5 mph134 bhp
Alfa Romeo Alfetta GTV 2.0 12119768.74 s16.68 s84.4 mph119 bhp
Renault Twingo GT 0.9 TCe 11020168.69 s16.67 s82.2 mph109 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Lancia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,681 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Lancia Delta 2.0 139 0-60 time?
The Lancia Delta 2.0 139 reaches 60 mph in 8.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 7,945th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Lancia Delta 2.0 139 quarter mile time?
16.64 s at 85.3 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.88 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.85 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Lancia Delta 2.0 139 have?
137 bhp and 1,215 kg, which is 113 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 206 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Lancia Delta 2.0 139?
Closest here on pace: Mazda 626 (Mk.5) Hatchback 2.0 136 (8.75 s), Alfa Romeo Alfetta GTV 2.0 121 (8.74 s), Renault Twingo GT 0.9 TCe 110 (8.69 s). Each one can be raced against the Lancia Delta 2.0 139 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Lancia Delta 2.0 139 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.