← My Auto Racer All cars Lancia 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175

The Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 reaches 60 mph in 9.84 s (100 km/h in 10.33 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.66 s, tripping the lights at 85.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.12 s and the eighth mile in 11.84 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 Kia cee'd Sport Wagon 2.0 16V 143

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175
0–60 mph9.84 s
0–100 km/h10.33 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.12 s
1/8 mile11.84 s
1/4 mile17.66 s
Trap speed85.2 mph

About the Kappa SW 2.4 175

The 1996 Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 is a front-drive naturally aspirated estate of 1,520 kg with 173 bhp, which works out at 114 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.12 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,852nd quickest to 60 mph, and the 78th quickest of the 150 Lancias here. It traps higher than its 0-60 suggests — 85.2 mph, the 7,153rd highest here — so it is a car that keeps going rather than one that simply leaves well. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175
Year1996
Power173 hp (129 kW)
Kerb mass1,520 kg
Power to weight114 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears4
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed128 mph (206 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Kia cee'd Sport Wagon 2.0 16V 14320079.82 s17.68 s84.0 mph141 bhp
Citroen XM Break 3.0 V6 17019949.78 s17.70 s83.5 mph168 bhp
Hyundai i40 Tourer 2.0 GDI 17720129.78 s17.52 s81.0 mph174 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Lancia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest estate cars1,484 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 0-60 time?
The Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 reaches 60 mph in 9.84 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,852nd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 quarter mile time?
17.66 s at 85.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.84 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.12 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 have?
173 bhp and 1,520 kg, which is 114 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 4 gears and a quoted top speed of 206 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175?
Closest here on pace: Kia cee'd Sport Wagon 2.0 16V 143 (9.82 s), Citroen XM Break 3.0 V6 170 (9.78 s), Hyundai i40 Tourer 2.0 GDI 177 (9.78 s). Each one can be raced against the Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Lancia Kappa SW 2.4 175 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.