← My Auto Racer All cars Mazda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993)

The Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) reaches 60 mph in 7.83 s (100 km/h in 8.24 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.24 s, tripping the lights at 88.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.83 s and the eighth mile in 10.67 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993)
0–60 mph7.83 s
0–100 km/h8.24 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.83 s
1/8 mile10.67 s
1/4 mile16.24 s
Trap speed88.2 mph

About the Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167

The 1993 Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) is a front-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,390 kg with 165 bhp, which works out at 119 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.83 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 6,178th quickest to 60 mph, and the 52nd quickest of the 201 Mazdas here. Its 88.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993)
Year1993
Power165 hp (123 kW)
Kerb mass1,390 kg
Power to weight119 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed137 mph (220 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 17019947.83 s16.24 s88.2 mph168 bhp
Hyundai XG 3.5i V6 19720037.83 s16.17 s90.7 mph194 bhp
Volvo V70 2.0T 18020047.79 s16.19 s85.5 mph177 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) 0-60 time?
The Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) reaches 60 mph in 7.83 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 6,178th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) quarter mile time?
16.24 s at 88.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.67 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.83 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) have?
165 bhp and 1,390 kg, which is 119 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 220 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993)?
Closest here on pace: Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 (7.83 s), Hyundai XG 3.5i V6 197 (7.83 s), Volvo V70 2.0T 180 (7.79 s). Each one can be raced against the Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.