← My Auto Racer All cars Renault 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170

The Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 reaches 60 mph in 7.83 s (100 km/h in 8.24 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.24 s, tripping the lights at 88.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.83 s and the eighth mile in 10.67 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993)

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170
0–60 mph7.83 s
0–100 km/h8.24 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.83 s
1/8 mile10.67 s
1/4 mile16.24 s
Trap speed88.2 mph

About the Laguna 3.0 V6 170

The 1994 Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 is a front-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,397 kg with 168 bhp, which works out at 120 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.83 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 6,176th quickest to 60 mph, and the 70th quickest of the 499 Renaults here. Its 88.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170
Year1994
Power168 hp (125 kW)
Kerb mass1,397 kg
Power to weight120 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed137 mph (220 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993)19937.83 s16.24 s88.2 mph165 bhp
Hyundai XG 3.5i V6 19720037.83 s16.17 s90.7 mph194 bhp
Toyota Avensis 2.0 15020007.80 s16.28 s87.3 mph148 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Renault 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 1990s2,649 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 0-60 time?
The Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 reaches 60 mph in 7.83 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 6,176th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 quarter mile time?
16.24 s at 88.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.67 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.83 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 have?
168 bhp and 1,397 kg, which is 120 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 220 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170?
Closest here on pace: Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 V6 167 (1993) (7.83 s), Hyundai XG 3.5i V6 197 (7.83 s), Toyota Avensis 2.0 150 (7.80 s). Each one can be raced against the Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Renault Laguna 3.0 V6 170 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.