← My Auto Racer All cars Mitsubishi 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84

The Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 reaches 60 mph in 10.83 s (100 km/h in 11.48 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.18 s, tripping the lights at 77.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.03 s and the eighth mile in 11.77 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 Lancia Beta 1.6 100

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84
0–60 mph10.83 s
0–100 km/h11.48 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.03 s
1/8 mile11.77 s
1/4 mile18.18 s
Trap speed77.0 mph

About the Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84

The 1988 Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 995 kg with 83 bhp, which works out at 84 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.03 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 11,421st quickest to 60 mph, and the 114th quickest of the 164 Mitsubishis here. Its 77.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84
Year1988
Power83 hp (62 kW)
Kerb mass995 kg
Power to weight84 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed106 mph (171 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Lancia Beta 1.6 100197510.82 s18.18 s76.9 mph99 bhp
Rover CityRover 1.4 8v200310.79 s18.20 s76.1 mph84 bhp
Nissan Almera / Pulsar 3dr 1.4 16V 87199510.84 s18.25 s75.4 mph86 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mitsubishi 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,513 carsFastest cars of the 1980s1,057 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 reaches 60 mph in 10.83 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 11,421st quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 quarter mile time?
18.18 s at 77.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.77 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.03 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 have?
83 bhp and 995 kg, which is 84 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 171 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84?
Closest here on pace: Lancia Beta 1.6 100 (10.82 s), Rover CityRover 1.4 8v (10.79 s), Nissan Almera / Pulsar 3dr 1.4 16V 87 (10.84 s). Each one can be raced against the Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 1.5i 84 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.