← My Auto Racer All cars Renault 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163

The Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 reaches 60 mph in 7.78 s (100 km/h in 8.23 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.13 s, tripping the lights at 87.1 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.53 s and the eighth mile in 10.48 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 Toyota Verso 2.2 D-4D 177

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163
0–60 mph7.78 s
0–100 km/h8.23 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.53 s
1/8 mile10.48 s
1/4 mile16.13 s
Trap speed87.1 mph

About the Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163

The 2003 Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 is a front-drive turbocharged MPV of 1,500 kg with 161 bhp, which works out at 107 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.53 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 6,084th quickest to 60 mph, and the 68th quickest of the 499 Renaults here. Its 87.1 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163
Year2003
Power161 hp (120 kW)
Kerb mass1,500 kg
Power to weight107 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed128 mph (206 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Toyota Verso 2.2 D-4D 17720097.87 s16.17 s86.5 mph174 bhp
Ford S-Max 2.520077.79 s16.05 s90.0 mph217 bhp
Citroen Grand C4 Picasso 1.6 THP 16520167.83 s16.13 s86.0 mph162 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Renault 0-60 timesevery modelFastest MPVs and people carriers478 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 0-60 time?
The Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 reaches 60 mph in 7.78 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 6,084th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 quarter mile time?
16.13 s at 87.1 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.48 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.53 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 have?
161 bhp and 1,500 kg, which is 107 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 206 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163?
Closest here on pace: Toyota Verso 2.2 D-4D 177 (7.87 s), Ford S-Max 2.5 (7.79 s), Citroen Grand C4 Picasso 1.6 THP 165 (7.83 s). Each one can be raced against the Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Renault Scenic 2.0 16V Turbo 163 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.