← My Auto Racer All cars Volvo 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Volvo V70 2.0 145

The Volvo V70 2.0 145 reaches 60 mph in 9.78 s (100 km/h in 10.89 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.54 s, tripping the lights at 80.8 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.81 s and the eighth mile in 11.36 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo V70 2.0 145 Skoda Superb 1.6 TDi 120

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Volvo V70 2.0 145
0–60 mph9.78 s
0–100 km/h10.89 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.81 s
1/8 mile11.36 s
1/4 mile17.54 s
Trap speed80.8 mph

About the V70 2.0 145

The 2007 Volvo V70 2.0 145 is a front-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,761 kg with 143 bhp, which works out at 81 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.81 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,748th quickest to 60 mph, and the 283rd quickest of the 386 Volvos here. Its 80.8 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Volvo V70 2.0 145
Year2007
Power143 hp (107 kW)
Kerb mass1,761 kg
Power to weight81 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed124 mph (200 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Skoda Superb 1.6 TDi 12020159.83 s17.44 s79.9 mph118 bhp
Skoda Octavia 1.4 G-TEC 11020179.73 s17.33 s78.9 mph109 bhp
Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.9 TiD 12020039.93 s17.51 s79.3 mph118 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) vs Volvo V70 2.0 145Full comparisonVolvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) vs Volvo V70 2.0 145Full comparisonSkoda Octavia 1.4 80 vs Volvo V70 2.0 145Full comparison

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Volvo V70 2.0 145 0-60 time?
The Volvo V70 2.0 145 reaches 60 mph in 9.78 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,748th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Volvo V70 2.0 145 quarter mile time?
17.54 s at 80.8 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.36 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.81 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Volvo V70 2.0 145 have?
143 bhp and 1,761 kg, which is 81 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 200 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Volvo V70 2.0 145?
Closest here on pace: Skoda Superb 1.6 TDi 120 (9.83 s), Skoda Octavia 1.4 G-TEC 110 (9.73 s), Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.9 TiD 120 (9.93 s). Each one can be raced against the Volvo V70 2.0 145 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Volvo V70 2.0 145 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.