← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 vs Kia Stonic 1.0 120

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph against the Kia Stonic 1.0 120’s 17.02 s — a margin of 0.03 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 takes 9.37 s and the Kia Stonic 1.0 120 9.38 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 Kia Stonic 1.0 120

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120Kia Stonic 1.0 120
0–60 mph9.37 s9.38 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.52 s2.56 s
1/8 mile10.90 s10.94 s
1/4 mile16.99 s17.02 s
Trap speed80.9 mph81.1 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120, 2/2 for the Kia Stonic 1.0 120 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120Kia Stonic 1.0 120
Year20192017
Power118 bhp118 bhp
Kerb mass1,348 kg1,185 kg
Power to weight88 bhp/t100 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbodieselTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelKia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 or the Kia Stonic 1.0 120 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.99 s to the Kia Stonic 1.0 120's 17.02 s, a margin of 0.03 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s against 9.38 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph.
What is the Kia Stonic 1.0 120 0-60 time?
The Kia Stonic 1.0 120 reaches 60 mph in 9.38 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.02 s at 81.1 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 trips the lights at 80.9 mph and the Kia Stonic 1.0 120 at 81.1 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 and 2 of 2 for the Kia Stonic 1.0 120. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.