← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 vs Nissan Murano 2.5 190

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.02 s at 79.5 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.4 166’s 17.67 s — a margin of 0.65 s. To 60 mph the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 takes 9.46 s and the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 9.99 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 Nissan Murano 2.5 190

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHonda CR-V 2.4 166Nissan Murano 2.5 190
0–60 mph9.99 s9.46 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.08 s2.54 s
1/8 mile11.56 s10.85 s
1/4 mile17.67 s17.02 s
Trap speed80.7 mph79.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166, 2/2 for the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHonda CR-V 2.4 166Nissan Murano 2.5 190
Year20072008
Power166 bhp188 bhp
Kerb mass1,537 kg1,950 kg
Power to weight108 bhp/t96 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelNissan 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,151 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 or the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 faster?
The Nissan Murano 2.5 190. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.02 s to the Honda CR-V 2.4 166's 17.67 s, a margin of 0.65 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.46 s against 9.99 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph.
What is the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 0-60 time?
The Nissan Murano 2.5 190 reaches 60 mph in 9.46 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.02 s at 79.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 trips the lights at 80.7 mph and the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 at 79.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 and 2 of 2 for the Nissan Murano 2.5 190. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.