← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II is the quicker car, covering it in 13.46 s at 104.2 mph against the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150’s 17.53 s — a margin of 4.08 s. To 60 mph the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II takes 4.92 s and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 10.17 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startLand Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II
0–60 mph10.17 s4.92 s
0–100 mph—12.34 s
60 ft2.61 s2.15 s
1/8 mile11.24 s8.69 s
1/4 mile17.53 s13.46 s
Trap speed78.3 mph104.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150, 8/10 for the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II
Year20112011
Power148 bhp469 bhp
Kerb mass1,595 kg2,374 kg
Power to weight92 bhp/t198 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 5 seconds2,159 cars0-100 km/h under 6 seconds2,897 carsQuarter mile under 14 seconds2,646 cars0-100 under 16 seconds2,743 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Land Rover 0-60 timesevery modelJeep 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 or the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II faster?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 13.46 s to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150's 17.53 s, a margin of 4.08 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 4.92 s against 10.17 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 0-60 time?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 reaches 60 mph in 10.17 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.53 s at 78.3 mph.
What is the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II 0-60 time?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II reaches 60 mph in 4.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 13.46 s at 104.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 trips the lights at 78.3 mph and the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II at 104.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2 150 and 8 of 10 for the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 Mk II. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.