Lotus Emira 2.0 365 vs Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat is the quicker car,
covering it in 11.62 s at
128.9 mph against the Lotus Emira 2.0 365’s
12.26 s — a margin of
0.64 s. To 60 mph the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat takes
3.80 s and the Lotus Emira 2.0 365
3.93 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Lotus Emira 2.0 365Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Lotus Emira 2.0 365
Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat
0–60 mph
3.93 s
3.80 s
0–100 mph
9.20 s
7.88 s
60 ft
1.95 s
1.94 s
1/8 mile
7.97 s
7.70 s
1/4 mile
12.26 s
11.62 s
Trap speed
116.2 mph
128.9 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Lotus Emira 2.0 365,
9/11 for the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 or the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat faster?
The Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 11.62 s to the Lotus Emira 2.0 365's 12.26 s, a margin of 0.64 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.80 s against 3.93 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 0-60 time?
The Lotus Emira 2.0 365 reaches 60 mph in 3.93 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.26 s at 116.2 mph.
What is the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat 0-60 time?
The Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat reaches 60 mph in 3.80 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 11.62 s at 128.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Lotus Emira 2.0 365 trips the lights at 116.2 mph and the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat at 128.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Lotus Emira 2.0 365 and 9 of 11 for the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.