Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 is the quicker car,
covering it in 16.43 s at
82.6 mph against the Mazda 2 1.3 75’s
19.32 s — a margin of
2.89 s. To 60 mph the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 takes
8.25 s and the Mazda 2 1.3 75
12.75 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Mazda 2 1.3 75Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Mazda 2 1.3 75
Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169
0–60 mph
12.75 s
8.25 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.30 s
2.51 s
1/8 mile
12.58 s
10.48 s
1/4 mile
19.32 s
16.43 s
Trap speed
73.1 mph
82.6 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Mazda 2 1.3 75,
2/2 for the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Mazda 2 1.3 75 or the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 faster?
The Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.43 s to the Mazda 2 1.3 75's 19.32 s, a margin of 2.89 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.25 s against 12.75 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mazda 2 1.3 75 0-60 time?
The Mazda 2 1.3 75 reaches 60 mph in 12.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.32 s at 73.1 mph.
What is the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 0-60 time?
The Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 reaches 60 mph in 8.25 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.43 s at 82.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mazda 2 1.3 75 trips the lights at 73.1 mph and the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169 at 82.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mazda 2 1.3 75 and 2 of 2 for the Lexus UX 200 2.0 CVT 169. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.